Mmmhhh. The guys at news.mydrivers.com have posted a picture of an Athlon XP 4000+ with 366MHz FSB.
Read more for the picture and why I'm almost sure it's fake.
I'm kinda sceptic as always.. but on the first look it looks ok.
Source says it's a Barton core with 366MHz FSB.
Strange thing about that is though, that the cpu markings aren't correct, at least not as they used to be.
The ID starts with 'AMD', while Athlon XP CPUs have an 'AXD' as first three letters.
The 'D' after '4000' stands for OPGA wich is ok, the following 'A' as voltage doesn't fit as well. There is no A, and has never been. Usual core voltage IDs have been letters like U,M and K.
Next should be a letter indicating the die temperature, but instead there's a number. Normally a number follows the temp, indicating the size of the L2 cache. A '3' would mean 256K, but Barton is supposed to have 512K, isn't it?
The 'D' at the end of the first set of numbers stands for 333MHZ FSB, that's why the 366 following (which fits in no coding scheme AMD has used so far) don't really work.
What's true now? Well, for me it's a fake, since the CPUID is totally wrong, and I doubt AMD would just throw their numberings overboard and make a new one, which makes no sense.
